need to know
meeting, for example, RED information is limited to those
present. In most circumstances RED information will be passed
verbally or in person.
# AMBER - Limited distribution. The recipient may share AMBER
information with others within their organization, but only on a
"need-to-know" basis.
# GREEN - Community wide. Information in this category can be
circulated widely within a particular community. However, the
information may not be published or posted on the Internet, nor
released outside of the community.
# WHITE - Unlimited. Subject to standard copyright rules, WHITE
Hello Salvatore!
> with very very low risk (you need to know the access to the control
> panel).
I'm agree with you that it's not vulnerability with very high risk, but it's
risk is not such low as you said. Because I have not such value of risk as
"very very low" (my minimum value is low aka "1/5") and for this kind of
vulnerability (which allow code execution for authenticated users) I'm
always giving risk value as moderate (aka "2/5"). Because there is a risk
Description
Fuzzylime (cms) is a way to run websites and keep it up-to-date. Once
installed, you can update from any internet-connected PC in the world -
you don't even need to know HTML! It has tons of features so whatever
you want from your site, chances are this script will be able to do it
for you.
Example
more explicit than ever before. Whether you need to lock down a
building or a computer, the OSSTMM is the go-to resource on how to do
it right and verify it. OSSTMM research has found its way into other
security standards like ISO 27000 series and the NIST documents so you
can be sure that when it comes to security, this is what you need to
know. This seminar will lay out the how and why of the OSSTMM 3 in
plain talk that will benefit and enlighten anyone whether they are
professionals or security do-it-yourselfers.
-- Mastering Trust for Couples and Families
If you ever wondered if you can open up or trust someone again then
could mean my whole network is owned in seconds.
It doesn't matter how secure all my guests are or that I use extremely
secure passwords or that I am current on all my patches or I am running a
super-tight firewall on each guest. A single API call bypasses all of that.
A script wouldn't even need to know the administrator's name, which isn't
administrator on all my systems, it just runs commands as whatever user has
logged in to the console. Locking the guest OS screens or having a
password-protected screen saver doesn't help any either, the code still
runs.
with Firefox, but without Chrome. In case if it's Cross-Application DoS
(http://websecurity.com.ua/2600/, which you can read on English
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://websecurity.com.ua/2600/&sl=uk&tl=en),
and Firefox 3.5.2 is affected via Chrome (you must test it by running
exploit in Firefox 3.5.2 on systems with and without Chrome installed), then
there are things which we need to know. Which browsers (Firefox 3.5.x and
others) are affected, and which versions of Chrome lead to this issue.
Besides, as I was informed recently, Google Chrome 1.0.154.65 is also
vulnerable.
/* tunnel mode gre multipoint */
/* tunnel key 123456789 */
/* */
/* This exploit works even if "ip nhrp authentication" is configured on the */
/* cisco router. You can also specify a GRE key (use 0 to disable this */
/* feature) if the GRE tunnel is protected. You don't need to know the */
/* NHRP network id (or any other configuration details, except the GRE key if */
/* it is set on the target router). */
/* */
/* NOTE: The exploit only seems to work, if a NHRP session between the target */
/* router and at least one client is established. */
(http://websecurity.com.ua/2600/, which you can read on English
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://websecurity.com.ua
/2600/&sl=uk&tl=en),
and Firefox 3.5.2 is affected via Chrome (you must test it by running
exploit in Firefox 3.5.2 on systems with and without Chrome installed), then
there are things which we need to know. Which browsers (Firefox 3.5.x and
others) are affected, and which versions of Chrome lead to this issue.
Besides, as I was informed recently, Google Chrome 1.0.154.65 is also
vulnerable.
John 'jur1st' Benson is a lawyer from Kansas City, MO who specializes
in electronic discovery and is also the chairman of the Kansas City
Metropolitan Bar Association Computer Law and Technology Committee.
John will be discussing how the electronic discovery process works,
why it is costing corporations millions of dollars (and why it doesn't
have to), and what attendees need to know in order to operate within
this new legal environment.
David 'Video Man' Bryan is computer security consultant for NetSPI and
a senior organizer of the annual DEFCON (www.defcon.org) computer
security conference in Las Vegas, NV. David will be presenting on the
This information is Cisco Highly Confidential - Do not redistribute.
THIS IS A DRAFT VERSION OF A SECURITY NOTICE THAT CONTAINS UNRELEASED
INFORMATION ABOUT CISCO PRODUCTS. DISTRIBUTION WITHIN CISCO IS
LIMITED TO PERSONNEL WITH A NEED TO KNOW. THIS DRAFT MAY CONTAIN
ERRORS OR OMIT IMPORTANT INFORMATION.
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND DOES NOT IMPLY ANY
KIND OF GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. YOUR USE OF THE
The installation is correctly performed and the configuration is
installed as default.
NETWPIN authenticated provisioning messages: device installs the
received configuration without performing any message authentication.
Sender does not need to know the correct IMSI value in order to let the
device accepts the message as correct. The configuration will be
installed regardless of the MAC value present in the message.
By sending provisioning messages in one of the above specified ways, an
attacker could pose as a legitimate trusted source and entice a victim
This information is Cisco Highly Confidential - Do not redistribute.
THIS IS A DRAFT VERSION OF A SECURITY NOTICE THAT CONTAINS UNRELEASED
INFORMATION ABOUT CISCO PRODUCTS. DISTRIBUTION WITHIN CISCO IS
LIMITED TO PERSONNEL WITH A NEED TO KNOW. THIS DRAFT MAY CONTAIN
ERRORS OR OMIT IMPORTANT INFORMATION.
THIS DOCUMENT IS PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND DOES NOT IMPLY ANY
KIND OF GUARANTEE OR WARRANTY, INCLUDING THE WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE. YOUR USE OF THE
3. This risk of this vulnerability can be mitigated by enabling
passphrase authentication on System Identity Manager. This way, users
would need to enter their username, password, and two random characters
of their secret passphrase. This means that even if the "update
password" request was successfully CSRFed, the attacker would still need
to know the victim administrator's passphrase to login.
Successfully tested on:
Server environment:
Fix Information
===============
It is advised that the source code of any bespoke ASP.NET file deployed
in the system is reviewed to ensure that no sensitive information would
be reviewed if an attacker abuses the download facility of the framework.
Additionally access on a need-to-know basis to SharePoint systems is
advised.
No workarounds exist at this point. However Microsoft has been contacted
so they can produce a fix for their customers. NGS has been advised that
although this issue will not be patched until the next release of
Limit login access and restrict privileges for Storage Essentials users
===================================================
If the procedure above is not chosen, the vulnerability can be worked around by limiting login access and restricting privileges for Storage Essentials users.
Limit login access to the Storage Essentials management server file system to those who need to know the access credentials of the elements managed by Storage Essentials.
Do not give users “Domain Admin” privileges unless necessary.
Do not give users a role with “System Configuration” rights unless necessary.
PRODUCT SPECIFIC INFORMATION
None
(http://websecurity.com.ua/2600/, which you can read on English
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http://websecurity.com.ua
/2600/&sl=uk&tl=en),
and Firefox 3.5.2 is affected via Chrome (you must test it by running
exploit in Firefox 3.5.2 on systems with and without Chrome installed), then
there are things which we need to know. Which browsers (Firefox 3.5.x and
others) are affected, and which versions of Chrome lead to this issue.
Besides, as I was informed recently, Google Chrome 1.0.154.65 is also
vulnerable.
Description:
Additionally, sensitive data such as the admin password is returned
within certain pages. Although after bypassing the authentication the
attacker wouldn't need to know the admin password anyway, this could be
handy for a cracker in scenarios such as the following:
1. The authentication bypass is fixed by updating the firmware to a
patched version (attacker would still be able to access the device since
he/she knows the admin password)
|
