> Message Edited by S1l3nc3 pl3as3 on 02-18-2009 11:15 PM
>
> --------------------------------------------------
> From: "Sandeep Cheema" <51l3n7@live.in>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:54 PM
> To: "Sandeep Cheema" <51l3n7@live.in>; "Jon Kloske" <jon@uq.edu.au>
> Cc: <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
> Subject: Re: SEPKILL /im SMC.EXE /f
>
>> In fact looks like Symantec has inherited the bug from Sygate. The
>> original one looks to be patched up though but on similar lines.
Message Edited by S1l3nc3 pl3as3 on 02-18-2009 11:15 PM
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Sandeep Cheema" <51l3n7@live.in>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:54 PM
To: "Sandeep Cheema" <51l3n7@live.in>; "Jon Kloske" <jon@uq.edu.au>
Cc: <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: SEPKILL /im SMC.EXE /f
> In fact looks like Symantec has inherited the bug from Sygate. The
> original one looks to be patched up though but on similar lines.
>> Message Edited by S1l3nc3 pl3as3 on 02-18-2009 11:15 PM
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> From: "Sandeep Cheema" <51l3n7@live.in>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:54 PM
>> To: "Sandeep Cheema" <51l3n7@live.in>; "Jon Kloske" <jon@uq.edu.au>
>> Cc: <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
>> Subject: Re: SEPKILL /im SMC.EXE /f
>>
>>> In fact looks like Symantec has inherited the bug from Sygate. The
>>> original one looks to be patched up though but on similar lines.
Regards, Sandeep
.--------------------------------------------------
From: "Jon Kloske" <jon@uq.edu.au>
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2009 9:11 AM
To: "Sandeep Cheema" <51l3n7@live.in>
Cc: <bugtraq@securityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: SEP(Symantec) Bug
http://service1.symantec.com/SUPPORT/ent-security.nsf/904c88a5602c2de388
2573410063493c/d02aafed7241b975802573aa0037fb30?OpenDocument
--
_________________
Jon Kloske [ITIG]
Systems Programming Manager
jon@uq.edu.au :: x54193 :: 78-516B
Faculty of EAIT, UQ :: CRICOS No. 00025B