|
|
 |
| New User, Welcome! Login |
Re: SecurityReason: PHP 5.2.6 SAPI php_getuid() overload
| From: |
Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-sec codelabs ru> |
| To: |
cxib securityreason com |
| Cc: |
bugtraq securityfocus com |
| Subject: |
Re: SecurityReason: PHP 5.2.6 SAPI php_getuid() overload |
| Date: |
Mon - Dec 08, 2008 02:03 AM |
Maksymilian, good day.
Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:40:48PM -0700, cxib@securityreason.com wrote:
> [ SecurityReason.com : PHP 5.2.6 SAPI php_getuid() overload ]
[...]
> Using PHP 5.2.6, as a Apache module can bypass many security points.
Am I right that this vulnerability exists only in the Apache 1.x flavour
of the PHP module? The code in question that sets SG(server_context)
too late and initializes BG variable after the .htaccess processing
exists only in sapi/apache/mod_php5.c. For Apache 2.x module the
handler is 'php_handler', it lives in apache2{filter,handler}/sapi_apache2.c
and BG/SG(server_context) are initialized before .htaccess processing.
And to clarify a bit the overall picture: am I right that the purpose of
your sleep.php manipulations is to make Apache to invoke another "fresh"
child that will process error_log contents with errorneous value of
uid/gid = 0? It seems to me that the effect of the found vulnerability
can be shortly characterized as "the first request for the given Apache
child will have uid/gid = 0 as the values returned from 'php_getuid()'
in the code that handles .htaccess contents (to be precise, in the code
inside the function send_php() before the call to
apache_php_module_main(), the point where BG is really initialized by
PHP_RINIT_FUNCTION(basic))". Am I missing something?
Thank you!
--
Eygene
|
|
|
Copyright © 1995-2012 LinuxRocket.net. All rights reserved.
Nearly all of LinuxRocket's features are free. Be kind and donate to the cause!