New User, Welcome! Login
Re: 5 char XSS?

From:	kuza55 <kuza55 gmail com>
To:	vuln-dev securityfocus com
Cc:
Subject:	Re: 5 char XSS?
Date:	Mon - Apr 28, 2008 11:04 PM
While this doesn't seem to apply to this particular bug, usually if
you have a short unfiltered injection then your best bet is to look
for a filtered injection later in the page and do a fragmentation
attack in 5 chars like this: (the </b=" is your unfiltered injection;
if they use " for quotes, you would use </b=' instead; if they use
both ' and " you could use </b=` but that would only work in IE)

<html>
<body>
<b/="

test" onmouseover=alert(1)

some other junk which is already on the page including another tag
such as a <div>div</div>
</body>
</html>

You'd probably want to use a style attribute with your filtered
injection rather than event handler but I'm sure you don't need my
help for that.

 - kuza55

2008/4/26 Kristian Erik Hermansen <kristian.hermansen@gmail.com>:
> Yes, you make a good point :-). However, the purpose of the email was
>  that we can't inject anything useful in 5 chars, so the XSS I posted
>  merely corrupts the page a little, and does not execute any scripts on
>  you.  Honest!  Go click the links and see ... Hehe
>
>
>
>
>
>  On 4/26/08, Serg B <sergeslists@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > Am I the only one who sees the irony of an XSS related email/question
>  > and example URLs to click? Heh.
>  >
>  >    Serg
>  >
>  >
>  > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Kristian Erik Hermansen
>  > <kristian.hermansen@gmail.com> wrote:
>  > > Just been noticing all the talk about Obama and Clinton sites and how
>  > >  the media keeps making a big deal out of all these XSS vulns, heh.
>  > >  However, I have a rather technical question about what, if anything,
>  > >  you can do when you have such a small buffer to exploit XSS?  Check
>  > >  out this one I found and is not listed by xssed.com for
>  > >  hillaryclinton.com.  You only get 5 chars to inject.  So, are there
>  > >  any tricks that could possibly be used to expand the limitation via
>  > >  perhaps some unicode kung-fu here?  Dunno, but thought it might be
>  > >  insteresting bring up because this is a common scenario in zip code
>  > >  search fields.  The fix for Clinton is as simple as whitelisting the
>  > >  input field set to [0-9]...
>  > >
>  > >
>  > http://www.hillaryclinton.com/actioncenter/event/?mt=0&d=250&z=%22%3EXSS&s=z&EventSearchAndResults%3A_ctl0.x=0&EventSearchAndResults%3A_ctl0.y=0
>  > >
>  > >  Regards,
>  > >  --
>  > >  Kristian Erik Hermansen
>  > >  --
>  > >  "Clever ones don't want the future told. They make it."
>  > >
>  >
>
>  --
>  Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
>
>
>
>  Kristian Erik Hermansen
>  --
>  "Clever ones don't want the future told. They make it."
>
Nearly all of LinuxRocket's features are free. Be kind and donate to the cause!